Difference between revisions of "Dress Watches"
From Chronopedia
(Created page with "==Dress Watches== thumb A dress watch needs to be simplistic. Elegant. And above all, minimalistic. It isn’t some gaudy watch t...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Dress Watches== | ==Dress Watches== | ||
[[File:Patek-Philippe-Calatrava-900x675.jpg|thumb]] | [[File:Patek-Philippe-Calatrava-900x675.jpg|thumb]] | ||
| − | A dress watch needs to be simplistic. Elegant. And above all, minimalistic. It isn’t some gaudy watch that’s bejeweled with diamonds or a chronograph that is so big it looks like a clock. It is subtle, understated and charming. The ultimate definition of a dress watch for many collectors would be a Patek Philippe Calatrava. | + | A dress watch needs to be simplistic. Elegant. And above all, minimalistic. Not even a date is required - it's not something you wear every day - just on formal, special, memorable occasions. It isn’t some gaudy watch that’s bejeweled with diamonds or a chronograph that is so big it looks like a clock. It is subtle, understated and charming. The ultimate definition of a dress watch for many collectors would be a [[Patek Philippe]] [[Calatrava]] or an Omega [[Constellation]]. |
Latest revision as of 16:18, 3 April 2020
Dress Watches
A dress watch needs to be simplistic. Elegant. And above all, minimalistic. Not even a date is required - it's not something you wear every day - just on formal, special, memorable occasions. It isn’t some gaudy watch that’s bejeweled with diamonds or a chronograph that is so big it looks like a clock. It is subtle, understated and charming. The ultimate definition of a dress watch for many collectors would be a Patek Philippe Calatrava or an Omega Constellation.
